Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Erin E.'s avatar

From your CTC piece: In effect, this had the important and vastly underrated effect of removing from these payments any stigma.

I hadn't thought of this, but absolutely true. Our family makes a little less than the single person cutoff per year (until I rejoin the workforce in about 3 years' time; even then, we'd still be below the two-income cutoff). The CTC was manna from heaven. Our grocery bills have skyrocketed and we really feel that. Our three sons are growing (as children tend to do) and clothing them and shoe-ing them adds up.

What's more, the CTC helped free us to more easily bear the cost of their few extracurriculars: music lessons and soccer or baseball for one, a flute ensemble and swimming lessons for the other (the littlest doesn't do anything yet). These are the types of activities that (in moderation!) make a child more well-rounded, expose them to more, supplement their public education.

Our eldest son is a freshman at a Title 1 school, in an international baccalaureate program. He's taking junior year math. He was just selected as one of seven students from his school to go on a Simmons Foundation-sponsored college visiting trip next week, to U of Richmond, American, Howard, Georgetown and the Naval Academy. We are thrilled! We couldn't afford such a trip ourselves.

I feel that the lower-middle class is often overlooked in the discussion about state-sponsored benefits. It's a moral obligation for a country as rich as ours to lift children out of poverty, but to then give children in the lower-income-but-not-impoverished stratum opportunities that come easily to peers of wealthier families is the next step.

Expand full comment
Andrew Roberts's avatar

Beautifully said

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts